What we offer

WHAT WE DO.
AND HOW
WE DO IT.

We practice three engineering disciplines. Each one is built on the same foundation — schema-first design, day-one observability, and a long-term view of the systems we put into the world.

01 —

SAAS PLATFORM ENGINEERING

Multi-tenant SaaS platforms designed for operational reality. Schema with row-level isolation, audit logging, observability — built before the first business endpoint.

Included
Row-level tenant isolationREST API · Node · Express · PrismaPostgreSQL · audit-trailedReact 19 · Vite · RBACStripe subscription billingResend transactional emailCI/CD · automated migrationsHardened VPS deployment
38 Prisma models
8 RBAC roles
Live CyVeR TMS · May 2026
02 —

MOBILE APPLICATIONS

Cross-platform mobile applications via Expo and React Native. Android-first, iOS in scope. Offline-first sync, real-time GPS, push orchestration — engineered for intermittent connectivity.

Included
Expo · React NativeOffline-first syncReal-time GPS · battery-consciousFCM push orchestrationCamera · signature · file uploadDeep linking · web backendOTA updates via Expo EASPlay Store submission
2 Apps in production
Live CyVeR Driver · Play Store
24/7 Offline-capable sync
03 —

WEB PRODUCTS

High-performance marketing sites, content platforms, internal tools. Astro for static-first content, Next.js for application complexity. Core Web Vitals as a constraint, not an afterthought.

Included
Astro 6 · islands architectureNext.js 15 · App RouterTailwind v4 · design systemSchema.org · OpenGraph · sitemapLighthouse 95+ · every pageGA4 · Microsoft Clarity · PlausibleCloudflare Pages · edge cachingCMS integration · headless
3 Sites in production
95+ Lighthouse score · all pages
1.0 CLS · zero layout shift
Discipline

WHAT WE DO. AND WHAT WE DON'T.

We are a small studio with strong opinions. The work we say yes to gets the attention it deserves. The work we say no to protects everyone involved.

We do
  • Multi-tenant SaaS platforms with real revenue at stake
  • Mobile applications for field-ops and consumer use
  • High-performance marketing sites where polish matters
  • Architecture reviews on existing systems
  • Long-term engagements over short-term contracts
  • Engagements where engineering quality is the differentiator
We don't
  • Take on more than three concurrent engagements
  • Compete on price against offshore contractors
  • Build proof-of-concepts we know will never reach production
  • Promise deadlines we can't engineer toward
  • Work on systems we wouldn't use ourselves
  • Compromise on observability or security to release faster
The difference

A STUDIO,
NOT AN AGENCY.

Most software shops are configured around throughput — fill the calendar, bill the hours, hand off the deliverable. We're configured differently. The difference shows up in the work.

Dimension
Standard agency
Cyber Verge
Project ownership
Distributed across PMs, designers, contractors
One technical mind, end-to-end
Schema design
Often skipped or rushed to start coding
Designed first, audited, documented
Security posture
Compliance checklist before launch
Structural, day-one, threat-modeled
Observability
Added after first incident
Built before first endpoint
Engagement size
Many concurrent clients
A small number at a time
Maintenance
Separate contract, separate team
Same engineer who built it
Documentation
Generated, often stale
Living, maintained with the codebase
Pricing model
Hours billed, scope creep
Engagement-scoped, outcome-focused

NOT SURE WHICH FITS?

Tell us what you're building and we'll figure out the right approach together.

START THE CONVERSATION →